top of page
Search

Why Self-Care Isn’t Working for High-Functioning People


If you’ve ever felt like you’re doing all the “right” things for your wellbeing and still ending up exhausted, you’re not alone.


You might have a consistent routine. You might go to therapy. You might be someone who is deeply self-aware and actively trying to take care of yourself.

And yet, there’s still a baseline level of depletion that doesn’t fully resolve.


This isn’t a motivation problem. It isn’t a discipline problem.


And more often than not, it’s not a lack of self-care.


What many high-functioning individuals are experiencing is something less talked about and more deeply embedded: a pattern of chronic overextension that has both psychological and physiological consequences.


To understand why traditional self-care often falls short, we have to look at what’s happening beneath the surface.

The Limits of Modern Self-Care


Much of what is marketed as self-care today is built around the idea of addition.

Add a routine. Add a practice. Add a product.


But for individuals who are already operating at a high level of output, the issue is rarely that they are doing too little.


In fact, many high-functioning people are already:

  • Highly disciplined

  • Consistently productive

  • Emotionally attuned to others

  • Capable of sustaining high levels of responsibility


In this context, adding more, even if it is labeled as “self-care,” can unintentionally reinforce the very patterns that are contributing to burnout.


This is where the distinction between high-functioning and overfunctioning becomes important.


High-Functioning vs. Overfunctioning


High-functioning refers to capacity.


It is the ability to manage responsibilities, regulate emotions, solve problems, and navigate complexity effectively.


Overfunctioning, on the other hand, is what happens when that capacity is used chronically and disproportionately, often without adequate recovery or support.


It is less about what you can do, and more about what you feel compelled to continue doing, even when it is no longer sustainable.


Over time, this pattern creates an internal imbalance.

And that imbalance has measurable effects on the body.


Allostatic Load: The Cost of Chronic Stress


In health psychology and neuroscience, the term allostatic load is used to describe the cumulative physiological burden of chronic stress.


The body is designed to handle stress in short bursts. When a stressor occurs, systems activate. Hormones like cortisol increase. The nervous system mobilizes.


Ideally, once the stressor passes, the body returns to baseline.


However, when stress is chronic, especially in individuals who consistently push through, suppress, or manage without adequate recovery, the body does not fully reset.


Instead, it adapts to a prolonged state of activation.

This leads to:

  • Increased inflammation

  • Disrupted sleep patterns

  • Cardiovascular strain

  • Immune system dysregulation


Over time, these changes accumulate, creating what researchers refer to as “wear and tear” on the body.


For high-functioning individuals who are used to operating under pressure, this process can go largely unnoticed until symptoms become harder to ignore.


Skin-Deep Resilience: When Coping Comes at a Cost



Research conducted by Gene H. Brody and colleagues at the University of Georgia introduces another important concept: skin-deep resilience.


In longitudinal studies of African American youth facing socioeconomic adversity, researchers found that individuals who demonstrated the highest levels of outward resilience—measured by academic success, self-control, and behavioral competence—also showed higher levels of allostatic load. In other words, they were doing well by external standards, but internally, their bodies were experiencing increased physiological strain.


This challenges a common cultural narrative that resilience is always protective.


Instead, it suggests that certain forms of high-effort coping may allow individuals to succeed in the short term while simultaneously increasing long-term health risks.


The resilience is real, but it is not without cost.

John Henryism: The Physiology of High-Effort Coping


A related concept, developed by Sherman A. James, is known as John Henryism.


The term is based on the folk legend of John Henry, a laborer who outperformed a machine at the cost of his own life.


In research contexts, John Henryism refers to a strong behavioral tendency to cope with psychosocial stressors through persistent, high-effort striving.


This pattern is particularly relevant for individuals who:

  • Feel a strong sense of responsibility to succeed

  • Have learned to rely primarily on themselves

  • Continue exerting effort even in the face of limited resources or systemic barriers


Studies have linked high levels of John Henryism with increased risk of hypertension and other stress-related health conditions.


What makes this concept especially important is that it reframes what is often praised as “work ethic” or “drive” as something that, in excess, can become physiologically taxing.


When Capability Becomes a Liability


Taken together, allostatic load, skin-deep resilience, and John Henryism point to a shared pattern:


The very traits that allow someone to function at a high level can, over time, contribute to imbalance when they are not supported by adequate recovery, connection, and internal awareness.


This is where many high-functioning individuals find themselves.

Outwardly competent. Internally depleted.


Not because they are failing, but because they have been sustaining a level of output that their body cannot continuously support.


A More Useful Framework for Self-Care



If the issue is imbalance rather than lack of effort, then the solution cannot simply be doing more. A more effective approach to self-care begins with three core components:


Awareness Developing an honest understanding of where your energy is going and how your internal systems are responding.

Balance Recognizing where you may be overextending in certain areas while neglecting others.

Connection Rebuilding relationships with your body, your needs, and, importantly, other people.


Rather than applying generalized self-care strategies, this framework encourages individuals to assess their own patterns and respond accordingly.


For some, the work may involve doing less. For others, it may involve engaging more directly with areas that have been avoided.


The key is that the response is individualized.

Moving Forward



If you recognize yourself in any part of this, it does not mean something is wrong with you.

It means your current way of operating has been effective, but may no longer be sustainable.


And that’s an important distinction.

Patterns can change.

But they usually don’t change in isolation.


If you’re interested in exploring this more deeply, I walk through these concepts in greater detail in a free workshop, along with a structured way to begin identifying your own patterns of imbalance.


References & Resources


If you want to explore the research behind these concepts more directly, here are a few starting points:


 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page